V8 Fauxrrari - MR2 Owners Club Message Board
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 30 (permalink) Old April 23rd, 2012, 17:44 Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 79
OldTrader Rating: (0)
V8 Fauxrrari

Howdy folks, thought some of you may be interested in my little swap.

Picked up this shell in exchange for my old V6Roadster from Mister Woods.



(Note, photoshopped to sit right, it's like a ruddy tractor right now)

The idea here being to get the engine in with the new Audi gearbox and not have to cut any firewalls other than the boot.

So...out with the angle grinder.



OlberJ is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 30 (permalink) Old April 23rd, 2012, 17:45 Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 79
OldTrader Rating: (0)
And sling the gearbox in to do some measuring up.







Now the issue is whether or not the driveshafts will pass the subframe or not without pushing the engine too far forward.

The fuel filler pipe will need moved down a bit to avoid the left head and it's going to be fooking close but i'm 99% sure this is gonna work pretty straight forward.

Subframe will be notched to allow it to sit a little further down and then i can mount up the gearbox and see if the engine will slide in in front. Time to make some sacrifices to the Flying Spaghetti monster
OlberJ is offline  
post #3 of 30 (permalink) Old April 24th, 2012, 09:59
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland Montgomery County
Age: 32
Posts: 2,258
OldTrader Rating: (12)
Very cool. Once you are done, you need to find the real version and make some videos
Thetailwind is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 00:14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno NV
Age: 47
Posts: 2,497
OldTrader Rating: (19)
What's the measurement from the bellhousing face to the firewall?

For those that may not know, the firewall is sloped (not vertical), and the bottom of the firewall is furthur away from the rear of the car than the top, so the top front of any engine used (heads & valve covers possibly) could interfere.
cbulen is offline  
post #5 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 00:21
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno NV
Age: 47
Posts: 2,497
OldTrader Rating: (19)
Yeah, I had the issue of the left CV joint would not clear the left suspension main lower control arm attachment point on the cross member. I solved it by moving everything forward, but I stuck to the transverse orientation, so I had the room to do it.
cbulen is offline  
post #6 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 12:12 Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 79
OldTrader Rating: (0)
At the moment, i'm working off 490mm from the bellhousing face to the front pulley. In the pics that is 490mm from the bellhousing face to the fuel filler pipe.

So when i move the fuel filler pipe lower and bypass the heater pipes from hell then there is a good few cm's to play with at the front. Even taking in the slope of the top of it and the fuel tank breathers it might still fit without too much hassle.

Even if i have to relieve the firewall a touch it won't be an issue.

There's a bit of trimming to be done on the subframe front edge and i'll also sink the gearbox as low as possible into the subframe.

It'll be tight but i reckon it might just work. Trying to get my head around the driveshaft up/down limits at the moment. Just how much range of movement do i need there?
OlberJ is offline  
post #7 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 12:43
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Age: 33
Posts: 677
OldTrader Rating: (6)
Some questions: Which engine are you runnning? What transmission is that? How does it go around the flywheel and clutch with that shaft running through the middle?

I'm wondering if that transmission would help with my v8 project.

Last edited by widebodystarlet; April 26th, 2012 at 12:46.
widebodystarlet is offline  
post #8 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 13:06 Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 79
OldTrader Rating: (0)
It's an Audi OB1 gearbox and an AHC engine i'll be using.

The flywheel and clutch are quite a clever arrangement, atm i haven't researched it completely but Paul assures me it will work and for some stupid reason i trust him.

From what i can see the clutch and flywheel sit beyond the driveshaft and then bolt to the engine crank by a spigot.
OlberJ is offline  
post #9 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 13:08
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno NV
Age: 47
Posts: 2,497
OldTrader Rating: (19)
It looks to me like he's using an Audi box, and is planning to use an Audi V8 (which are the shortest of the easily obtainable V8's made). 490mm is about the length of the Audi V8's.

Audi ran the front axle through the bellhousing to get the engine overhang to be as small as possible. They insist on a longitudinal layout, even in their FWD only cars, just like thier AWD cars, like a subaru and unlike say, an EVO, or Celica All-Trac. Unlike the japanese cars, Audi puts the diff on the right side of the bellhousing. You can see it in his photos. Please note that this arrangement is Audi's newest. The older Audi FWD gearboxes (that are easier to find in the states) do not run the intermediate shaft through the bellhousing, and the axle centerline is aft of the bellhousing. I'm not sure what year they switched to the new arrangement. OberJ can let us know, and I believe its a Europe only deal.

He will have to use an OEM style clutch and flywheel, which are made to clear that front axle intermediate shaft.

Olber: I found that removing the heat sheild from the MR2 firewall, removing the fiberglass, and removing the Vent tube/vapor expansion tube from the firewall allowed me to move my engine MUCH further forward. YOu can remotely locate the tubes somewhere else, as they are coupled to the MR2 gas take via rubber hoses. The fuel filler is a little trickier, as you will need to make a new one, and route the rubber connecting hose to a different location, and you will probably need a longer hose.

I think these are better options than cutting the firewall. Also, the lower section of the firewall (where the stock MR2 front mount attaches to the car) is an integrated crossmember--its structural, so I strongly recommend not cutting into this.
cbulen is offline  
post #10 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 13:10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno NV
Age: 47
Posts: 2,497
OldTrader Rating: (19)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OlberJ
It's an Audi OB1 gearbox and an AHC engine i'll be using.

The flywheel and clutch are quite a clever arrangement, atm i haven't researched it completely but Paul assures me it will work and for some stupid reason i trust him.

From what i can see the clutch and flywheel sit beyond the driveshaft and then bolt to the engine crank by a spigot.
Yes, that's correct. The flywheel and clutch are AFT of the jackshaft. There is a very thick, but small diameter spacer between the crank flange and the flywheel.

I assume you live in the UK or europe?
cbulen is offline  
post #11 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 13:11 Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 79
OldTrader Rating: (0)
There we go. And to make it work we need a 6/10 bolt custom spigot/spacer made up.

I think the OB1 boxes are 2010 onwards IIRC.
OlberJ is offline  
post #12 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 13:17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno NV
Age: 47
Posts: 2,497
OldTrader Rating: (19)
Mike_H's (member on this forum) Mk2 with a Audi V8/Audi gearbox:

http://www.mv8r.com/wordpress/worlds...-its-not-mine/

running car video: http://www.mv8r.com/wordpress/video-...2-engine-swap/
cbulen is offline  
post #13 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 13:23 Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 79
OldTrader Rating: (0)
Yeah i've seen that. Liked the build but couldn't go with the whole cabin intrusion or equivalent chassis stretch at the rear.

If this goes in as i think it will, it'll get a lot of attention from the kit car boys i think. How many 355/360/430 Mk2 kits are out there?
OlberJ is offline  
post #14 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 13:26
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno NV
Age: 47
Posts: 2,497
OldTrader Rating: (19)
BTW, isn't "Fauxrrari" the word the loser in Fast-N-Furious used when Walker asked him the price of his car?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzAlJU3oxoU
cbulen is offline  
post #15 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 13:29
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Reno NV
Age: 47
Posts: 2,497
OldTrader Rating: (19)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OlberJ
Yeah i've seen that. Liked the build but couldn't go with the whole cabin intrusion or equivalent chassis stretch at the rear.

If this goes in as i think it will, it'll get a lot of attention from the kit car boys i think. How many 355/360/430 Mk2 kits are out there?
I understand that perfectly. For my own project, minimal to no cutting of the car body was the goal. I am pretty sure the Northstar + F40 goes into the mk2 chassis without cutting anything major. May need to hammer a couple of "clearance dents" in a couple of places, and the X-member needs to be cut some. But the X member is easy to replace, so in theory, I can go back to stock if I want to.
cbulen is offline  
post #16 of 30 (permalink) Old April 26th, 2012, 13:30 Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Age: 38
Posts: 79
OldTrader Rating: (0)
Ha, is it?

Oh dear, the old man came out with it one night when we went to look at the car and it just kinda stuck.

I'm removing all the badges and making it into a prototype/challenge spec looking car to try and get away from the whole replica thing. It's a nice shape but it's not a Fezza and i'm not trying to kid anyone on it is.

OlberJ is offline  
post #17 of 30 (permalink) Old April 28th, 2012, 10:02
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Quincy, MA
Age: 33
Posts: 4,600
OldTrader Rating: (15)
There ya go. Make it what it is, not what it isn't. Good philosophy!
Turbowned is offline  
post #18 of 30 (permalink) Old May 1st, 2012, 03:33
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southern Ca
Age: 34
Posts: 7,276
OldTrader Rating: (133)
more pics of the shell, with more angles would love to see it
marley4us is offline  
post #19 of 30 (permalink) Old May 2nd, 2012, 19:39
Gold Level
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Age: 38
Posts: 3,446
OldTrader Rating: (14)
you may have to make a custom crossmember like i had to here:





it makes the angles a bit high on the axle shafts, but it's well within the limits:
Gouky is offline  
post #20 of 30 (permalink) Old May 2nd, 2012, 20:25
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: maryland
Posts: 547
OldTrader Rating: (15)
i wish i could buy that 355 kit in the Us, but you can only buy it in the Uk for the Mr2. ive seen plenty 355 kits for the Fiero's with the Northstar
cottonbelly is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the MR2 Owners Club Message Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: (0 members)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome